Can cell-based wild seafood save oceans around the world?
Teresa Romanovsky • August 3, 2021
Fishing has earned itself an extensive rap sheet of offences, including overfishing, slavery, child labour, illegal fishing and price-fixing. Commercial fishing is a term that encompasses an array of techniques used to capture marine animals to sell.
Overfishing has led to such a depletion of world fish stocks that it is threatening the industry's long-term viability. To add to the already alarming statistics and the efforts to curtail overfishing, climate change may intensify the complications of declining fish stocks. World leaders in conventional seafood fishing are anxiously looking at plant-based and cell-based fish products as a replacement.
Governmental organisations and marine specialists are deeply concerned about the depletion of fish stocks. Understandably, they have concerns about commercial fishing and the massive impact on the ecology of the oceans. Alarmingly, The United Nations Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) estimates that almost 80 per cent of the world's fish species are depleted or fully exploited. Their research shows that flounder, cod, haddock, swordfish and bluefin tuna have been particularly hard hit. Commercial fishing is responsible for the untimely deaths of other marine animals such as turtles, dolphins and sharks.
International associations and communities are taking steps to reduce grave overfishing and are concerned about the future of commercial fishing. Are there alternative proteins available that can meet the needs of consumers from around the world? There are genuine concerns that global climate change and the increasing levels of carbon dioxide could inhibit the formation and growth of coral reefs, negatively impacting fish stocks.
Constant talk revolves around cultured beef burgers and laboratory-grown chicken breasts. Can scientists produce cell-based seafood in their labs? To produce cell-based seafood, scientists will need to extract muscle cells from various types of fish, crustaceans or molluscs and then propagate them in a bioreactor. Typically, the cells are grown on an edible scaffold that gives them structure and the same texture as wild-caught fish.
Thai Union is the principal parent company that operates under various brand names such as John West in the UK, Mareblu in Italy, Chicken of the Sea in the USA and Petit Navire in France. At the end of June 2021, the company announced that they signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with V Foods (Thailand) Co., Ltd. V Foods is the producer of More Meat plant-based protein and V Farm plant-based food. The companies will operate out of the same manufacturing facilities, produce existing goods, and develop new products for future consumption.
V Foods is a highly innovative company that puts its heart into research and development and works with the farming community to offer quality food for health and environmentally conscious consumers. The collaboration between Thai Union and V Foods will drive growth in alternative proteins and ready-to-eat, plant-based food.
There are already several companies that are taste-testing cell-based salmon, Pacific yellowtail and shrimp. One of the main concerns is consumer rejection. A staggering 80 per cent of new food products that hit supermarket shelves are rejected by fickle consumers. Marketers have to convince people to make the switch from traditional fish products to cell-based seafood. Initially, the production costs will be way above wild or farmed fish.
A Sobering Reality Check Australia’s emissions reduction report card is in, and it makes for uneasy reading. Strip away land use changes, and national emissions have dropped just 3% since 2005. While federal targets remain focused on achieving net-zero by 2050, progress is painfully slow across energy, transport, and industrial sectors. Politicians may debate policy, and analysts may point to infrastructure bottlenecks, but there’s a more human variable we urgently need to talk about: talent. Could the decarbonisation lag be less about ambition and more about our inability to scale the workforce to match?
Welcome to the Automation Dilemma AI has officially moved from speculative buzzword to standard tool in the hiring process. From screening CVs to scheduling interviews and even conducting first-round assessments, AI promises efficiency, objectivity, and speed. But as recent headlines show, the automation of recruitment may come at a cost we’re only beginning to understand. In the past fortnight alone, Workday was ordered to face legal action in the US over allegations that its AI-led hiring discriminated against applicants. And in Australia, deepfake job applicants have infiltrated the remote workforce, raising red flags about identity verification. So the question isn’t can AI replace recruiters. It’s should it?
A Scientific Milestone, A Talent Wake-Up Call When Sydney-based alt-protein startup Vow secured regulatory approval for its cultured quail product from FSANZ (Food Standards Australia New Zealand), headlines rightly celebrated the scientific milestone. But behind the slick bioreactors and media buzz lies a less discussed, yet equally vital question: who will build, scale, and commercialise this new frontier of food production? For purpose-led businesses working at the cutting edge of sustainability, this approval is more than a win for cellular agriculture. It’s a signal that Australia’s alt-protein sector is maturing - and the race for specialised talent is on.