The Four Day Week Conundrum

Teresa Romanovsky • April 13, 2022

It is well known that many companies around the world and even entire countries are committed to providing a better working environment for their employees. More and more employers commit to the four-day working week or experiment with compressed schedules and reduced working hours to see how productivity compares. Long working weeks can be responsible for burnout and associated illnesses resulting in lost productivity.  But the jury is still out for the vast majority of organisations as whether it really will work in the long run.  In comes another experiment......


Pilot Programme 


The United Kingdom coordinated a four-day week pilot programme with
4 Day Week Global, UK think tank Autonomy and the 4 Day Week UK Campaign. The six-month trial runs in parallel with similar pilot schemes in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the United States and Ireland. The project will work closely with researchers from Cambridge University, Boston College and Oxford University. 


Interested companies had until the end of last month to register and attend the various rollout sessions. April will see onboarding sessions, training and further preparation with the support team. In May, the partners will establish baseline metrics for research in time for the launch of the six-month trial period that runs from June until November 2022. Interested organisations have unparalleled access to resources, tools and expertise to ensure a successful trial.


Adopting a four-day workweek is a business improvement strategy centred on working smarter rather than longer and investing in the well-being of the most critical asset to any business – people. The pilot programme advocates for the 100-80-100 model – 100% of the pay, 80% of the time, but critically in exchange for 100% of the productivity.


Happiness and Balance 


Whilst countries are still figuring out the long-term benefits of a shorter working week; there is ample evidence that fewer hours doesn't mean less work output. Employees who worked shorter weeks reported a better work-life balance and improved productivity. Companies benefited from higher productivity and lower operational costs. 


Various studies clearly show that employees reported higher levels of happiness because of a better life balance. They could spend time with friends, family and pets, enjoy their hobbies and exercise more, all boosting personal satisfaction, well-being and productivity. 


Delivering Productivity


Andrew Barnes is a New Zealand-based entrepreneur and philanthropist. He founded New Zealand's most prominent corporate trustee company, Perpetual Guardian. He successfully spearheaded the trust company's efforts to create four-day working weeks explained, "It's not just having a day off a week - it's about delivering productivity, meeting customer service standards, meeting personal and team business goals and objectives".


Most employees would prefer an additional day off, whereas employers may worry about the reduced hours, supervision of employees and the same overheads. The results are precise. Employees who work a four-day week are more productive; they are happy to work for a company that values their contributions and leaves them feeling encouraged, engaged and empowered.


Family Time


A four-day workweek can mean you spend more time with your family. Interestingly, the new way of working can also be cost-saving, particularly when childcare costs are involved. In a recent article, the BBC explained, "Since the pandemic brought unprecedented change to the world of work, there's been considerable discussion around the four-day workweek. Touted as a panacea for burnout and work stress, businesses and even governments have been experimenting with the idea; preliminary results suggest potential benefits include better work-life balance and improved well-being – at no cost to employee productivity".


Working week debates have been around for decades. In 1926, the Ford Motor Company standardised the Monday-to-Friday pattern; beforehand, it was common to work a six-day week, with only Sundays off. Henry Ford's theory was that the reduced work week with the same pay would increase worker productivity. He was right, and in the century since, a five-day week has been commonplace. In the 1950s, labour unions were already calling for a four-day week. 


Changing Protocols 


Throughout the pandemic, it's clear how dramatically work protocols can change. The Great Resignation has forced companies to look at new retention tools and recruitment techniques. So far, there are various four-day workweek models, including:


  • Cutting one workday, reducing working hours and paying the same wage
  • Intense working hours where five days of work is crammed into four days


Companies are introducing new tools and operating practices that boost efficiency and promote worker satisfaction and well-being, fuelling productivity. As global leaders have introduced various pilot schemes, permanent employees are familiar with the pros and cons of the four-day workweek. Whilst employee well-being is rising, burnout is reducing, and productivity is on the up, some workers feel disconnected from their companies because they are working fewer days and feel that they are drifting away or not visible enough to be selected for new projects or promotions. 


Watch This Space
 


Careers for Purpose will follow closely the four-day workweek pilot scheme in the United Kingdom. Watch this space for updates, thoughts and insights on the reduced working hour movement. 


A person is holding a wind turbine and a chimney in their hands
By Teresa Romanovsky June 30, 2025
A Sobering Reality Check Australia’s emissions reduction report card is in, and it makes for uneasy reading. Strip away land use changes, and national emissions have dropped just 3% since 2005. While federal targets remain focused on achieving net-zero by 2050, progress is painfully slow across energy, transport, and industrial sectors. Politicians may debate policy, and analysts may point to infrastructure bottlenecks, but there’s a more human variable we urgently need to talk about: talent. Could the decarbonisation lag be less about ambition and more about our inability to scale the workforce to match?
By Teresa Romanovsky June 30, 2025
Welcome to the Automation Dilemma AI has officially moved from speculative buzzword to standard tool in the hiring process. From screening CVs to scheduling interviews and even conducting first-round assessments, AI promises efficiency, objectivity, and speed. But as recent headlines show, the automation of recruitment may come at a cost we’re only beginning to understand. In the past fortnight alone, Workday was ordered to face legal action in the US over allegations that its AI-led hiring discriminated against applicants. And in Australia, deepfake job applicants have infiltrated the remote workforce, raising red flags about identity verification.  So the question isn’t can AI replace recruiters. It’s should it?
A small piece of food is on a plate next to a glass of wine.
By Teresa Romanovsky June 30, 2025
A Scientific Milestone, A Talent Wake-Up Call When Sydney-based alt-protein startup Vow secured regulatory approval for its cultured quail product from FSANZ (Food Standards Australia New Zealand), headlines rightly celebrated the scientific milestone. But behind the slick bioreactors and media buzz lies a less discussed, yet equally vital question: who will build, scale, and commercialise this new frontier of food production? For purpose-led businesses working at the cutting edge of sustainability, this approval is more than a win for cellular agriculture. It’s a signal that Australia’s alt-protein sector is maturing - and the race for specialised talent is on.
More Posts