Is the Interview Process Flawed?

Teresa Romanovsky • May 26, 2022

Recruiters and human resources professionals are creating interesting dialogue around various interview techniques and wondering if they are flawed or not. The process probably hasn’t changed much in the past decade, with the attitude ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’ and could be considered an artificial environment. Shifting the routine and making changes could result in more effective interviewing techniques and processes and the start of creating more robust, more committed teams.

High Turnover Rates


Most hiring manager still insist that interviews are a fundamental requirement for hiring the right person. However, with staff turnover rates of almost 50 per cent during the first year of employment, that’s clearly not the case.


Chemistry 


Typically, the way hiring managers assess candidates can be somewhat skewed and subjective and can be based on inadvertent assumptions and preconceptions of the interviewer, even down to the chemistry and interaction of the interviewer and the candidate, appearance, tone of voice, and mood. 


Logically, interviews should not be the sole basis when making a hiring decision. An interview shows how candidates behave in a professional setting, but there is little evidence shown during this short time to assess how they would perform in the job environment. It’s important to remember that some people may interview poorly but have the perfect technical skills required for your team. Others may interview perfectly and be a great fit on paper but will not fit your company culture. 


Multiple Assessments 


It's essential you use every opportunity throughout the application process to evaluate candidates and find multiple ways to assess their skills and experience. This could include timeliness and attention to detail gauged through communications processes, specific role-targeted tests or questions so that the candidate is not judged purely on their personality or interview skills or lack thereof. It’s vital that hiring managers move away from historically used techniques and questions such as  "Where do you see yourself in five years?" or "Tell me about a time when you demonstrated you were a team player”.


References 


Reference taking also allows you to ask relevant questions about the candidate’s competency and team spirit. During the reference process, recruiters can question how the candidate handled situations in the past and begin to understand their overall behaviour within their previous roles. Hiring managers must take time to learn about the candidate and their interest in the role to assess their strengths and weaknesses. The candidates should also have plenty of opportunities to ask questions throughout the interview.


Smart Hiring


A smart hiring process will allow the candidate to meet multiple people in individual and group interview formats to prevent bias. This hiring process should remain consistent to compare like with like. Expanding the pool of interviewers to those who have hands-on experience allows a better understanding of role requirements and if the candidate is suitable for employment. Solely counting on the hiring manager could lead to a poor hire. 


Behavioural-Based Interviews 


Where possible, develop a behavioural-based interview format so candidates have ample opportunity to demonstrate their potential for success by providing examples of how they handled similar situations based on their experience. The technique is based on the idea that real past experiences are a solid indicator of future performance. Instead of the recruiter using hypothetical questions, the candidate provides examples from previous job knowledge and moves away from possible duplicitous and planned responses. By using the STAR approach, interviewers can strategically structure the questions so that the candidate can demonstrate a specific
Situation or behaviour, the Tasks involved, Actions taken and Results. 


Follow-Up Interviews 


Hiring managers should conduct follow-up interviews since they best understand their team's requirements. While human resources specialists can conduct an interview, they won’t know as much about the role as a person with hands-on experience. It’s prudent to involve at least three company stakeholders in the interview process. A flawed interview process can cost the company considerably with poor hiring decisions, high turnover, and possible relocation costs.


Individual Recruiting Methods


It's important to remember that not every interview technique and process works for every company. No role or candidate is the same as the company’s needs will change over time. It’s essential to look at failings and successes and adapt so that departments can hire the best candidates. 


By Teresa Romanovsky August 19, 2025
Recruitment may not be the first industry you think of when it comes to carbon emissions. Yet the environmental footprint of traditional hiring practices is larger than many realise: flights for interviews, paper-heavy processes, in-person assessments that involve travel and energy use. All of these add up. At the same time, “sustainable recruitment systems” are proving to be far more than a buzzword. They are helping organisations reduce waste, attract values-driven talent, and future-proof their workforce strategies. In other words, green hiring is both a moral and a commercial imperative .
By Teresa Romanovsky August 4, 2025
At this year’s ReGen Expo , the programme was thoughtfully divided into two key tracks: The Resource Stage , focused on innovations in recycling and resource recovery. The Circularity Stage , showcasing upstream redesign, system change, and regenerative business models. Both matter, but they’re not the same. Recycling plays a critical role in reducing what ends up in landfill. But circularity reaches further, asking how we might design waste out altogether . In short: If recycling is like treating the symptoms, circular processes are like building a lifestyle that prevents the illness in the first place. 
A person is holding a wind turbine and a chimney in their hands
By Teresa Romanovsky June 30, 2025
A Sobering Reality Check Australia’s emissions reduction report card is in, and it makes for uneasy reading. Strip away land use changes, and national emissions have dropped just 3% since 2005. While federal targets remain focused on achieving net-zero by 2050, progress is painfully slow across energy, transport, and industrial sectors. Politicians may debate policy, and analysts may point to infrastructure bottlenecks, but there’s a more human variable we urgently need to talk about: talent. Could the decarbonisation lag be less about ambition and more about our inability to scale the workforce to match?