The Good, The Bad and The Ugly of Returning to the Office

The Good: The Silver Lining of In-Person Work

Enhanced Networking and Mentorship

Physical presence in the office often leads to spontaneous interactions, fostering better networking, mentorship, and coaching opportunities. These direct interactions can be a game-changer for diverse employees, who might traditionally face challenges in these areas due to systemic biases. Supervisors and managerial staff can play a pivotal role in an employee's career trajectory, and face-to-face interactions can significantly influence this dynamic.

Boosted Engagement and Recognition

A shared workspace promotes collaborative interactions over transactional exchanges. When colleagues collaborate in person, a tangible energy is often missing in virtual meetings. Such environments can enhance productivity and engagement, with employees feeling more valued for their unique contributions. Moreover, immediate feedback and acknowledgement in a physical setting can boost morale and motivation.

The Bad: The Unintended Consequences

Accommodations for Employees with Disabilities

The ability to work from home has been an advantage for many employees with disabilities. Research from Leesman indicates that many workers identify as having impairments that affect their work. For these employees, the home environment provided a conducive and comfortable space, free from the challenges and distractions of traditional office settings. Requiring them to return can only be beneficial if companies ensure equitable exception policies and necessary accommodations.

Potential for Biased Practices

One of the unintentional benefits of remote work was the levelling of the playing field. Many biases and inequities plaguing traditional office settings were minimised in a virtual environment. With a return to the office, there's a risk of reverting to old patterns. Companies must proactively address and mitigate these biases through training and awareness programmes.

Financial Implications

The pandemic-induced remote work era led to significant lifestyle changes for many. Employees relocated to more affordable areas, established new routines, and enjoyed savings from reduced commuting and daily expenses. A mandated return to the office can introduce financial burdens, from increased commuting costs to potential relocation or added childcare expenses. Employers must be mindful of these challenges and offer support through stipends, reimbursements, or flexible schedules.

The Ugly: The Potential Fallout

Strained Company Culture

Any abrupt policy change, especially one that affects daily routines, can lead to dissatisfaction and divisions within a company. A lack of flexibility or inadequate communication can foster resentment, leading to a toxic work environment. Organisations must approach such changes with sensitivity, open communication, and a willingness to adapt based on feedback.

Risk of Losing Talent

The modern employee values flexibility. Inflexible policies drive employees, especially top talent, to seek opportunities elsewhere. Companies offering more accommodating work arrangements or supporting remote work will be more appealing, leading to a potential talent drain from less flexible firms.

The Perspective of Employees with Disabilities

The value of remote work for employees with disabilities cannot be overstated. A large study of almost 24,000 people across 27 countries found a quarter of employees said they would quit if forced back to the office. McKinsey researchers found disabled employees were 14% more likely to leave than employees without disability if they could not work in a hybrid way from both home and the office.  Citing benefits such as better management of health conditions, reduced sensory issues, increased focus, and overall well-being, and the elimination of commuting, often a significant challenge for those with mobility impairments, is another notable advantage.

Moreover, the mental well-being of employees with disabilities often improves when working from home, leading to increased productivity. Respondents in recent research highlighted that their mental health improved thanks to reduced stress, less anxiety, and an overall happier feeling at work. Almost two-thirds of disabled employees believed they were more productive when working from home than in an office or external workplace setting. This sentiment underscores the importance of flexible work arrangements, not just for convenience but for the holistic well-being of employees.

In a tight labour market, companies must recognise and accommodate the unique needs of these employees, not just as a moral imperative but also as a smart business strategy.

In the aftermath of COVID-19, the United States has reportedly seen a rise in the employment of individuals with disabilities due to labour shortages. Meanwhile, Australian HR approaches seem to trail behind. However, a notable exception is the Australian Public Services (APS), which has recently declared the removal of restrictions on how many days an employee can work remotely each week.

Moving Forward with Inclusion

In today's competitive landscape, leading companies prioritise inclusivity. By understanding and addressing the diverse needs of all employees, companies can foster a more inclusive and productive work environment. This includes training managers to handle hybrid teams, assessing the skills of disabled employees beyond traditional workplace norms, and allowing more flexibility in work-from-home arrangements.

• 
  Educating managers on overseeing hybrid teams, including employees working remotely and from a central office, as well as understanding the needs of employees with disabilities who work from home. 
• Evaluating the competencies and talents of employees with disabilities rather than merely gauging how they align with conventional workplace norms. 
• Promoting remote work for employees with disabilities to enhance their independence, efficiency, and well-being. 
• Empowering managers to greenlight work-from-home requests from employees with disabilities, even if they exceed the standard organisational limits. Excessive approval requirements can be time-consuming and might discourage such requests.

In conclusion, while in-person work has undeniable benefits, companies must approach the return-to-office decision with empathy and understanding. By doing so, they can ensure a harmonious transition that respects and values the diverse needs of all employees, fostering a culture of inclusivity and mutual respect.